babelblogs

hosted by cafebabel.com

Chris' Babel Blog

The occasional rants and musings of the UK based writer and Cafe Babel correspondent.

To content | To menu | To search

thoughts { Keyword }

27

10

2007

A Bit of Romance

Romeo and Juliet When they met again, her heart had turned to stone.

I sometimes wonder if we over-romanticise relationships.

Perhaps Romeo and Juliet got it right. End it whilst you are still wrapped up in the other person, still in the throes of passion, when you genuinely believe that it is the two of you against the world. If they hadn’t ended it then, they would have more than likely have faded into history: another statistic, an irrelevant anecdote and an awkward moment when they bumped into one another with new partners.

Deciding not to sacrifice themselves and build a future together, they had the decisive and inevitable talk.

Romeo: I think I love you

Juliet: I think I love you too. Romeo, I was thinking...



Romeo: Aha...

Juliet: Well, I was thinking that living in separate courts is a logistic nightmare.



Romeo: And so difficult these days for young professionals in Verona to get on the housing ladder."

Juliet: I know, the prices have been shooting up since the Renaissance.

Juliet: (Seizing her chance) Well, why don't we pool our resources?

And from that innocuous exchange, they move in together and things soon begin to change. They still have fun, but instead of long weekend mornings in bed, spontaneous adventures and mini-breaks they start to spend an inordinate amount of time arguing about whose parents they will spend Christmas at (ooh, the irony). Romeo will get annoyed that he cannot go to the tavern for a few flagons with his mates without getting several messengers (my Shakespearian take on texting) interrupting him and asking to go to the supermarket on his way home. As time goes on they will both stop putting the effort into the relationship and their end will not only be tragic but benignly protracted. What’s more all the happy times they shared together will be conveniently forgotten amid a myriad of bitterness and conjecture.

This week I have been pondering a difficult question, that every man has probably considered at one time or another and a conundrum that has fleshed out many an issue of Cosmopolitan.

Is it possible to be friends with an Ex?

The straw poll that I have done of friends has returned conclusive findings. No way. But I am not so sure. I know people who I have had the most fleeting, random acquaintance with and we have gone on to become friends. Others, where our relationship has bordered on fondness, have disappeared into the ether. I bumped into an example of this a few weeks back (in a lift at Uni to add to the awkwardness) and she fixed me with the sort of venomous stare that one usually reserves for child killers.

What was it that I did wrong, I hear you ask. Did I promise to call and then didn’t? No. Did I run off with her flatmate? No. My only failing was having the honesty to tell her that I didn’t want a relationship. At the time I was enjoying the novelty of being single and the thought of reaching my mid-20s cash rich, selfish and morally ambiguous held a certain allure. I would have quite happily maintained a platonic friendship, but any such thought was deemed an anathema.

Perhaps being able to stay friends, like much in life, comes down to a question of intelligence and maturity.

So if you are out drinking tonight and notice two people looking frostily at each other across the club, remember that they could have been the next Romeo and Juliet if only the monotony of reality hadn’t got in the way.

20

10

2007

English Dreams (English Heartache)

rugby.jpg I recall reading some years back that male sex drive, testosterone and fertility rise at times where a man's sports teams are doing well. So, whilst the Favelas in Rio become even more overcrowded after another Brazilian masterclass, by the year 2100, should trends continue, the population of the British Isles will be around 27. Watching the Rugby in the pub tonight I will bite my nails down to their wick, shout myself hoarse and should we win will walk around with a huge grin on my face. However as the clock ticks around to eight o'clock, I am filled with a deep sense of foreboding and cynicism, angst and a general malaise. A condition symptomatic of any seasoned, patriotic Englishman.

I just know, in the great English tradition, that they will f- it up and grab defeat from the jaws of victory.

Tis the English way.

Ah, but what about 2003 people will say. We did Australia in their own backyard. But in the same way that we toasted the 2005 Ashes success, we knew that it was a unique occurence the moment the first ball left Harminson's hand a couple of years later. The English football team messing up in Russia last Wednesday would have riled me more if it had not been oh so predictable. Just at the point you think you can relax and believe in an England team they mess up. It could be worse, and some people say that the English have an overblown sense of their own significance on the World stage. But it is not the losing per se that riles me but the manner in which we lose. An Englishman will invest so much emotional currency in the cause only to be let down. English sporting teams are prick-teasers. You take an interest in them, buy them drinks, subscribe to their inane chatter but when it comes down to the crucial moment they disappear off into the night and leave you to get a taxi home alone.

I was idealistic once, but I think that died when Chris Waddle skied the ball into the balmy Turin night in Italia '90. Two years later, when England were knocked out of Euro '92 by Sweden (the late Brian Moores' commentary 'Brolin...Dahlin...Brolin...oh yes!' still makes me angry fifteen years on). After that match I went to my bedroom and tore down all my England posters. My cynicism that year was reflected in my trick or treat costume.

I went as Graham Taylor.

But England's underperformance continued unabated in the classic fashion. Tabloid logic prevailed. England did not fail to qualify at the next World Cup because of their own ineptitude but by that of a referee in Rotterdam. I wonder if this is a traditional English approach throughout history? After the massacre at the Battle of the Somme, for example, instead of blaming Haig's incompetent strategy was it more a question of the Germans not playing fair with their machine guns?. The next European and World Championsips came around and with every disappointment my optimism was further skewered.

In many ways I crave the innocence that I had as a child. When I cried when England were knocked out of Italia '90 the hot, fat tears that rolled down my 9 year old cheeks were pure and genuine. Like when your first love leaves you for a mate, your emotions flow freely. You have never felt such pain before and have no point of reference to fall back on. When it happens again, you are upset, but in your more cynical mindset you put it down to experience, possibly go out and get drunk and start all over again...

The line between sport and love is an ambiguous one, as in many ways they are each a metaphor for one another.

Come on England, make me believe again.

Chris